How to Roast Ethiopia Sidamo at Home: Gentle Filter Dialed-In Recipe
Data-backed home roast case study for Ethiopia Sidamo ETH04: profiles tried, rest lessons, and the Gentle Filter corridor.
The short answer: for washed Ethiopia Sidamo (ETH04), the current dialed-in home recipe is Gentle Filter at level 2.2 / 100g — fruity, smooth, ~12% DTR. Earlier NordicLight ~2.8 / 120g was the first clear fruit win after rest; F-WSH 1500-2200 failed hard on this lot.
Ethiopia · Sidamo · Washed · 1,400-2,200 MASL · G2 · John Burton
Ethiopia Sidamo ETH04
aroma of caramel, lemon flower and spices. Flavours of madeira cake and black tea with lemongrass undertones. Long lemon black tea finish. Crispy acidity, medium coating body. Score: 82.5+
Best so far: Bright Filter at level 2.0, 120 g — tasted good 1 of 1 time.
The journey
- Tasted good
- Had a fault
- Not tasted yet
What the roasts show
- Roast 1: 9minFilter at level 2.0, 100 g. 1 with a fault (grassy, roasty).
- Then level 2.0 → 1.7, profile 9minFilter → Raost Sidamo: roast 2. 1 with a fault (roasty).
- Then level 1.7 → 2.5, profile Raost Sidamo → NordicLight: roast 3. 1 good.
- Then level 2.5 → 3.0, load 100 g → 110 g: roast 4. 1 with a fault (grassy).
- Then level 3.0 → 2.8, load 110 g → 120 g: roast 5. 1 good.
- Then level 2.8 → 2.0, profile NordicLight → F-WSH 1500-2200: roast 6. 1 not tasted.
- Then level 2.0 → 2.2: roast 7. 1 not tasted.
- Then level 2.2 → 2.3: roast 8. 1 with a fault (grassy).
- Then level 2.3 → 2.5, profile F-WSH 1500-2200 → Gentle Filter, load 120 g → 100 g: roast 9. 1 with a fault (sour, roasty).
- Then level 2.5 → 2.0, profile Gentle Filter → Rich Filter: roast 10. 1 good.
- Then load 100 g → 120 g: roast 11. 1 with a fault (grassy).
- Then level 2.0 → 2.2, profile Rich Filter → Gentle Filter, load 120 g → 100 g: roast 12. 1 with a fault (roasty).
- Then level 2.2 → 2.0: roast 13. 1 good.
- Then level 2.0 → 2.1: roast 14. 1 good.
- Then profile Gentle Filter → Bright Filter, load 100 g → 120 g: roast 15. 1 not tasted.
- Then level 2.1 → 2.0: roast 16. 1 good.
- Then load 120 g → 150 g: roast 17. 1 not tasted.
- Weight lost: good roasts 9.0%–14.0%, roasts with a fault 12.6%–14.6%.
- Time in the hot zone: good roasts 1:39–3:00, roasts with a fault 1:49–2:59.
- End temperature: good roasts 214 °C–223 °C, roasts with a fault 212 °C–224 °C.
- Good cups were tasted after 10–36 days of rest (6 tastings).
This shows what differed in the roast. It does not say why the cup tasted different.
Recipes tried
Bright Filter
Still dialling in · 3 roasts · 2:40–2:47
- 2.0 · 120 g · 1 roast, Tasted good
- 2.0 · 150 g · 1 roast, Not tasted yet
- 2.1 · 120 g · 1 roast, Not tasted yet
Gentle Filter
Moved on · 4 roasts · 2:23–2:28
- 2.0 · 100 g · 1 roast, Tasted good
- 2.1 · 100 g · 1 roast, Tasted good
- 2.2 · 100 g · 1 roast, Had a fault
- 2.5 · 100 g · 1 roast, Had a fault
Rich Filter
Moved on · 2 roasts · 2:59–3:00
- 2.0 · 100 g · 1 roast, Tasted good
- 2.0 · 120 g · 1 roast, Had a fault
F-WSH 1500-2200
Moved on · 3 roasts · 1:48–1:58
- 2.0 · 120 g · 1 roast, Not tasted yet
- 2.2 · 120 g · 1 roast, Not tasted yet
- 2.3 · 120 g · 1 roast, Had a fault
NordicLight
Moved on · 3 roasts · 1:39–1:49
- 2.5 · 100 g · 1 roast, Tasted good
- 2.8 · 120 g · 1 roast, Tasted good
- 3.0 · 110 g · 1 roast, Had a fault
Raost Sidamo
Moved on · 1 roast · 2:36
- 1.7 · 100 g · 1 roast, Had a fault
9minFilter
Moved on · 1 roast
- 2.0 · 100 g · 1 roast, Had a fault
The recipe that stuck
- Profile
- Gentle Filter
- Level
- 2.2
- Batch
- 100g
- 13.9%
- 2:23
- End temperature
- 221°C
- Winning batch
- R-094 · 2026-07-14
nice and fruity, smooth, a little darker, could probably be roasted a tick lighter.
Compare two recipes
Nothing differed by more than normal roast-to-roast variation.
- Hot zone about the same (2:47 vs 2:40)
- End temperature about the same (223 °C vs 222 °C)
No weight after roasting for Bright Filter at level 2.0, 120 g, so weight lost is not compared.
This shows what differed in the roast. It does not say why the cup tasted different.
What the roasts taught
- NordicLight ~2.8 / 120g (R-037) first hit “nice and fruity” after rest — early 9min/Raost runs were green or dark-flat.
- Gentle Filter around 2.2–2.5 / 100g became the cleaner modern lane (R-069, R-094): fruity, no green, watch for a touch dark.
- F-WSH 1500-2200 at 2.3 was awful underdeveloped on this lot — same family that works for Gatugi is not automatic here.
- Current fine-tune: Gentle Filter at 2.0 (R-101) after “tick lighter” feedback on R-094.
Where the good cups live
Roast level against batch size. Colour is the profile; a larger dot is a roast that tasted good.
Roast mechanics across the roasts
Roast loss, hot zone and end temperature for each logged roast. Each line has its own scale, so compare shapes, not heights.
Roast goal
Stop roast just after first crack completes to preserve the signature lemon acidity and black tea delicacy. Aim for a light brown color with no oil development. Focus on highlighting the madeira cake sweetness while maintaining the crispy, bright character that defines high-altitude washed Ethiopians.
The counts in this guide are from when it was written. Roasts added since then are in the Ethiopia Sidamo roast log, which lists every attempt and how it tasted.
Watch the short
About this Sidamo
Sidamo (Sidama) is one of Ethiopia’s trademarked regions — caramel, lemon flower, madeira cake, black tea, lemongrass, crispy acidity. This JARC-varietal G2 lot was roasted for origin clarity with a light finish just after first crack.
Journey highlights
Early misses: 9minFilter and Raost
First cups were green with dark bitterness, or dark-flat with caramel/chocolate instead of fruit — wrong balance for a bright washed Ethiopian goal.
NordicLight breakthrough
NordicLight ~2.8 / 120g after proper rest became “nice and fruity,” with one batch improving substantially between day 7 and day 17. Rest time was part of the recipe.
Gentle Filter as the modern lane
Gentle Filter @ 2.5 was “nice and fruity, no green — but a little dark.” Gentle Filter @ 2.2 (R-094) kept the fruit and smooth body with a note to go a tick lighter — which became 2.0 on R-101.
The F-WSH trap
F-WSH 1500-2200 at 2.3 — the family that later won Kenya Gatugi — was “awful, underdeveloped, no sweetness no fruit” here. Copy-paste profiles across origins fail.
Dialed-in recipe
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Profile | Gentle Filter |
| Level | 2.2 (fine-tune 2.0 if dark) |
| Batch | 100g |
| DTR | ~12% |
| Loss | ~13.9% |
| Rest | 7–10+ days |
Full charts and attempt history: Sidamo case study →
Related reading
- How to roast Ethiopia Yirgacheffe
- How to roast Kenya Gatugi peaberry
- Kaffelogic Nano 7 profiles
- Sidamo coffee guide
- Data page: /roast-logs/ethiopia-sidamo-eth04
Track every roast, improve every batch
BrewedLate helps home roasters log green coffee inventory, roast batches, Kaffelogic curves, and get AI recommendations — all in one web-based tool.
How to roast Ethiopia Sidamo on a Kaffelogic Nano
Dialed-in recipe from a 13-roast log for washed Sidamo ETH04
Load 100g green
A 100g load for stable heat transfer.
Select Gentle Filter at level 2.2
Or start 2.0 if prior cups tasted a touch dark on the bloom.
Target ~12% DTR
Match the winning corridor when ambient allows; prioritize cup over chasing a number.
Rest 7–10 days
Re-evaluate after full rest before changing family.
Taste for madeira cake, black tea, lemon
Fruity and clean — not grassy, not dark-flat.
Frequently Asked Questions
What profile works best for washed Ethiopia Sidamo on a Kaffelogic?
Can I use F-WSH 1500-2200 for Sidamo like for Kenya?
What DTR should I target for Sidamo filter roast?
How long should Sidamo rest after roasting?
Is NordicLight or Gentle Filter better for Sidamo?
Related Articles
How to Roast Ethiopia Yirgacheffe at Home: Gentle Filter After 14 Roasts
A data-backed case study of dialing in washed Ethiopia Yirgacheffe: batch size, failed dark F-WSH runs, and the Gentle Filter corridor that worked.
How to Roast Kenya Gatugi Peaberry: 17 Roasts to a Dialed-In Cup
A data-backed case study of dialing in washed Kenya Gatugi peaberry: batch size as the hidden variable, profile experiments, and the final roast metrics that stuck.
How to Roast Colombia ASOSPAC: Bright Filter for Fruit + Chocolate
Data-backed case study for Colombia ASOSPAC COL03: profile experiments toward a fruity-bright goal with real klog metrics.
How to Roast Swiss Water Decaf Brazil: F-NAT 0-1200 at 3.4
Data-backed case study for natural-process Swiss Water Decaf Brazil: medium chocolate-nutty goal and the F-NAT corridor that stuck.