Perú El Edén Roast Log: F-WSH 1500-2200 at Level 2.3 After 6 Roasts

The journey

• Tasted good
• Had a fault
• Not tasted yet

What the roasts show

1. Roast 1: Hyper Filter 01 at level 2.0, 100 g. 1 good.
2. Then level 2.0 → 2.3, profile Hyper Filter 01 → F-WSH 1500-2200, load 100 g → 120 g: roasts 2–3. 1 good, 1 not tasted.
3. Then level 2.3 → 1.0, profile F-WSH 1500-2200 → KL WASHED: roast 4. 1 with a fault (grassy, sour, roasty, flat).
4. Then level 1.0 → 2.0, profile KL WASHED → F-NAT 1500-2200: roast 5. 1 not tasted.
5. Then level 2.0 → 1.0, profile F-NAT 1500-2200 → Adap. Raost NCC, load 120 g → 100 g: roast 6. 1 not tasted.

• Weight lost: good roasts 11.1%–11.4%.
• Good cups were tasted after 10 days of rest (2 tastings).
• The first good cup on F-WSH 1500-2200 at level 2.3, 120 g was roast 3 of 6.

This shows what differed in the roast. It does not say why the cup tasted different.

Recipes tried

• Adap. Raost NCC

  Still dialling in · 1 roast

  • 1.0 · 100 g · 1 roast, Not tasted yet

• F-NAT 1500-2200

  Moved on · 1 roast

  • 2.0 · 120 g · 1 roast, Not tasted yet

• KL WASHED

  Moved on · 1 roast · Hot zone 1:32

  • 1.0 · 120 g · 1 roast, Had a fault

• F-WSH 1500-2200

  Moved on · 2 roasts · Hot zone 1:50

  • 2.3 · 120 g · 2 roasts, Tasted good

• Hyper Filter 01

  Moved on · 1 roast · Hot zone 2:04

  • 2.0 · 100 g · 1 roast, Tasted good

Compare two recipes

Nothing differed by more than normal roast-to-roast variation.

• Weight lost about the same (10.4% vs 11.2%)

No usable roast log for Adap. Raost NCC at level 1.0, 100 g, so hot zone and end temperature are not compared.

This shows what differed in the roast. It does not say why the cup tasted different.

Numbers are averages over each recipe's roasts.